top of page

Lay-off or Pay-Cut? Is there a right way?

Updated: Oct 13

With companies across the world announcing mass layoffs. Here is how it compares with Pay-cuts.

ree

In Pay-Cuts, risk is distributed to all employees, as a result everybody loses a small part of their salary instead of losing 100%.


Hence,

1) Pay-Cuts are more humane,

2) Post Lay-Offs, a company’s image is tarnished, a chuck of money is to be spent on PR, re-building public image, payment of severance money, & so-on.


Therefore, Pay-cuts may end up saving money for the company as against its counterpart lay-offs.



So, Pay-Cuts is the winner?


Well, Pay-Cuts:

1) demotivate Employees,

2) tend to retain the worst employees, (best ones are already sitting on job offers)


An ailing company needs to get rid of non-productive employees to survive.



More so, it comes out that, Pay-cut may look good in the short run but are rather detrimental for the company later.



But is it all bad?

In places, where the whole industry/economy is facing a downturn, Pay-cuts may be good, given that there is job scarcity in the market (Raise salaries when situations reverse).


But, if it’s just your company going through a phase, Beware! Pay-cuts may lead other companies in the sector to poach your talent.



Therefore, it becomes all the more crucial for entrepreneurs to understand the economy & industry trends along with their own needs before taking such critical decisions!

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.

see what we can
do for your organization

043-wallet-1_edited.png
Business Roadmap Advisory
011-stats_edited.png
Strategic Finance Office
036-invoice-1_edited.png
Investment Banking
Sell-side
003-diamond_edited.png
Investment Banking
Buy-side
019-payment-system_edited.png
Mergers & Acquisition
Advisory
bottom of page